The UK and US Governments refused to sign a Joint International Declaration On Inclusive and Sustainable Artificial Intelligence (AI) as the AI Action Summit Drew to a Close.
A Total of 61 Countries – Including France, China, India, Japan, Australia and Canada – Have Signed A Statement on Inclusive and Sustainable Artificial Intelligence for Peeple and penet Hich affirmed a number of shared priorities.
This includes promoting ai accessibility to reduce digital divides between rich and developing counts; “Ensuring ai is open, inclusive, transparent, ethical, safe, secure and Trustworth, Taking into account interactive frameworks for all”; Avoiding Market Concentrations Around the Technology; Reinforcing International Cooperation; Making AI Sustainable; And encouraging deployments that “positively” shape labour markets.
“This summit has highlighted the importance of reinforcing the diversity of the AI EcoSystem,” it said.
“It has Laid an open, Multi-STKEHOLDER and Inclusive Approach that will enable ai to be human rights-based, human-classric, ethical, safe, security and trustworth,” ES BEGINING To Have Multi -Sstakelder dialogues and cooperation on Ai Governance,
“We underline the need for a global reflection inter -alia questions of safety, sustainable development, innovation, respect of interactive laws incidence humanitarian law and Human Right and Human Right of Humanity An rights, gender equality, linguistic diversity, protection of consumers and of of Intellectual Property Rights. “
Who and us governments have not immediatively out ives that are in UK National Interests ”.
Disputing regulation
DURING The Summit, Us Vice-PRESIDENT JD Vance said that “Excessive Regulation of the AI Sector Could Kill A Transformative Industry”, Adding that “We Need Interactive Regulatory Regulates of Rather than strangle it ”.
Aside from European RegulationHe also criticized cooperation with China, as well as any regulation that threatens the interests of us companies. “We feel very strongly that ai must Remain free from ideological bias and that American ai will not be co-opted into a tool for authoritarian censorship,” called Vance.
“The Trump Administration is Troubled by reports that some foreign governments are considering tightening the screenws on us tech companies with international footprints,” He added. “America cannot and will not accept that, and we think it's a terrible mistake, not just for the united states of america, but for your own counties.”
The AI Action Summit Follows The Inaugural AI Safety Summit Hosted by the UK Government at Bletchley Park in November 2023, and the Ai Seoul Summit in South Korea In May 2024. While Both Previous Summits were criticized for a Lack of Inclusivity, they larger focused on risks associateed with the technology and placed an emphasis on Improving Its Safety Through International Scientific Cooperation and Research,
In contrast, The AI Action Summit has Seen Politicians and Industry Figures Decry the burden of ai red tapeWhile simultaneously Committing Hundreds of Billions of Further Investment to Ai-Related InfrastructureWhich aims to rapidly scale the technology.
Regulatory race to the bottom?
Independent Fact-CHACKING CRATY FULL FAULL FAUCTICS The Statement, Saying That it Risks Undercutting Britain's “Hard-WON CRIDIBILITY as A World Leader” Forous, Worty ai.
“We need bolder government action to protect people from corrosive ai-generated misinformation that can damage public health and disrupt democracy at unprecedented spoken and scale,” unifwhenful andrew doodle, “ Full Fact's Head of Ai.
Adam Leon Smith – An AI Expert from BCS, The Chartered Institute for it, added: “When we surweeyed technology experts last year, 88% said it was impart Standards in AI and Other High -Sstakes Technologies.
“Whather That's Through a Declaration or Not, The World's Richest Countries will ultimately At this critical moment in human history, “He said .
Given the Emphasis Placed on deregulation by Vance and other key political Figures during the summit, some argued they are setting the stage for a “race to the bottom” on Ai regulation.
Jeni Tennison, Executive Director of Non-Profit Connected by Data, Said: “It's unsurprising that the current us administration would decline to sign a comment to more inculc IR version of free speech blacklists these terms. It's unplear if the UK government objects to any particular part of the summit statement, or is simply trying to stay on the good side of trump and us investors. “
Commenting on Vance's “Confused” Speech About Excessive Regulation, She Added: “He Reinforced The US's Deregulatory, Race-to-to-Bottom Trajectory for Ai, While Championing Insurgent Competition and Worter Vry Things Regulation is Needed for. “
Sandra wachter, a professor of technology and regulation at the oxford internet institute, said rhetoric arguing that regulation will strike innovation is misleading. “Regulation is trying to make ai less biased, more explainable and less harmful,” She said.
“Who does really win when there is no regulation? How is your life improved if sexist ai decides that your child is not allowed to attend university? How is your life improved when opaque ai fires you and you do't even receive an explanation? How is your life improved if ai is allowed to spread misinformation on the web? How is your life improved if we use unsafe and untested ai in healthcare?
“I think we really need to question this rhetoric,” She said. “Who Wins if there is no regulation? Is it eight billionaires or the other eight billion people? “
Constructing alternatives
Criticising the content of the statement itself, Gaia Marcus, Director of the Ada Lovelace Institute, said “it fails to build on the mission of making ai safe and trustworth, and The Safety Commitments of Previous SummitsThere are no tools to ensure tech companies are help accountable for harms. And there is a growing gap between public expectations of safety and government action to regulate. “
However, Marcus did note that the summit has offered some alternatives for the future. “It proposes a future where ai is used sustainably – through the coalition for sustainable ai,” She said. “And a future where the technologies, tooling and infrastructure are widely accessible for use in the public interest – through the Ai Foundation – If IT Gets Sufficient Support While MainTaining Real Independence. “
Marcus added that governments must build and invest in alternatives to ensure the value and benefits of tech advances are felt by everything by everything in a way that “Avoids pay paying extractionate Rent to a fewer carge com company
Mike Bracken, A Founding Partner at Digital Transformation Consultancy Public Digital, Said While The UK and Us Governments' Refusal to sign is a Visible Sign of Tension, It Should Not Overseas SSIVE Delivery-Based Outcomes ”of the Summit, Such As the sustainability coalition and the public interest ai foundation, Known as current ai.
“I have Attended many government-backed events which results in statements and handshakes and warm words; The ones that really matter are the only that result in institutions, money, change and delivery, “He said, adding that the real success of the summit is in how it has it has recast ai regist ai as a public good thoughts. “It's not simply seen as an extension of monopolistic technology providers,” Said Bracken.
He added Esed during the Summit.
“I don't meaning wards creating data sharing Agreements for Public Bodies – They are all far more important than the command, in my opinion, “said Bracken.